Analiza slučaja pred Evropskim sudom za ljudska prava
Evropska Konvencija o ljudskim pravima
Praktični vodič za primenu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima
Priručnici i vodiči kroz praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Evropski sud za ljudska prava u 50 pitanja
Preuzmite presudu u pdf formatu
EVROPSKI SUD ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA
DRUGO ODJELJENJE
PREDMET DESPOTOVIĆ protiv CRNE GORE
(Predstavka br. 36225/11)
PRESUDA
STRAZBUR
16. januar 2020.godine
Ova presuda je pravosnažna, ali može biti predmet redakcijske izmjene.
U predmetu Despotović protiv Crne Gore, Evropski sud za ljudska prava (Drugo odjeljenje), na zasijedanju Komiteta u sastavu:
Arnfinn Bårdsen, predsjednik,
Ivana Jelić,
Darian Pavli, sudije,
i Liv Tigerstedt, vršilac dužnosti zamjenika registrara odjeljenja,
Nakon vijećanja na sjednici bez prisustva javnosti, održanoj 12. decembra 2019.godine, donosi sljedeću presudu, koja je usvojena tog dana:
POSTUPAK
ĈINJENICE
PRAVO
I NAVODNA POVREDA ĈLANA 6 STAV 1 KONVENCIJE
Ĉlan 6 stav 1
“Prilikom odluĉivanja o njegovim građanskim pravima i obavezama... svako ima pravo na ... raspravu u razumnom roku pred ... sudom...”
II PRIMJENA ĈLANA 41 KONVENCIJE
“Kada Sud utvrdi prekršaj Konvencije ili protokola uz nju, a unutrašnje pravo Visoke strane ugovornice u pitanju omogućava samo djelimiĉnu odštetu, Sud će, ako je to potrebno, pružiti praviĉno zadovoljenje oštećenoj strani.”
IZ TIH RAZLOGA, SUD, JEDNOGLASNO,
Saĉinjeno na engleskom jeziku, u pisanoj formi, 16. januara 2020.godine, u skladu sa Pravilom 77 stavovi 2 i 3 Poslovnika Suda.
Liv Tigerstedt Arnfinn Bårdsen
vršilac dužnosti zamjenika registrara predsjednik
PRILOG
U predstavci su navedene žalbe u smislu ĉlana 6 stav 1 Konvencije (prekomjerna dužina trajanja građanskog postupka)
|
Br. predstavke Datum podnošenja |
Ime podnosioca predstavke Datum rođenja
|
Ime zastupnika i mjesto |
Datum kada je postupak zapoĉet ili datum stupanja na snagu Konvencije u odnosu na Crnu Goru (03.03.2004.godine) |
Datum kada je postupak okonĉan |
Ukupna dužina trajanja Nivo i nadležnosti |
Relevantna domaća odluka |
|
36225/11 03.03.2011.godine |
Miljan Despotović 19.09.1979.godine |
Sava Đ. Popović Podgorica |
03.03.2004.godine
|
01.07.2010.godine
|
6 godina, 3 mjeseca i 28 dana 3 nivoa nadležnosti |
Vrhovni sud Crne Gore Rev.br. 945/10 od 01.07.2010.godine |
____________________________________________
Prevod presude preuzet sa https://sudovi.me/vrhs/sadrzaj/NQN9
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF DESPOTOVIĆ v. MONTENEGRO
(Application no. 36225/11)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 January 2020
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Despotović v. Montenegro, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Arnfinn Bårdsen, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Darian Pavli, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 12 December 2019,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in an application against Montenegro lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 3 March 2011.
2. The applicant was represented by Mr S.Đ. Popović, a lawyer practising in Podgorica.
3. The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the application.
THE FACTS
4. The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table.
5. The applicant complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings.
THE LAW
6. The applicant complained that the length of the civil proceedings in question had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement. He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
Article 6 § 1
“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
7. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
8. In the leading case of Stakić v. Montenegro, no. 49320/07, §§ 45-51, 2 October 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.
10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
11. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
12. The applicant did not submit any claims for just satisfaction. Accordingly, the Court considers that there is no call to award him any sum on that account.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 January 2020, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Liv Tigerstedt Arnfinn Bårdsen
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings)
|
Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name Date of birth
|
Representative’s name and location |
Start of proceedings or date of entry into force of the Convention in respect of Montenegro (3 March 2004) |
End of proceedings |
Total length Levels of jurisdiction |
Relevant domestic decision |
|
03/03/2011 |
Miljan Despotović 19/09/1979 |
Sava Đ. Popović Podgorica |
03/03/2004
|
01/07/2010
|
6 years, 3 months and 28 days 3 levels of jurisdiction |
Supreme Court of Montenegro Rev.no. 945/10 01/07/2010 |
baza unakrsnih veza