Analiza slučaja pred Evropskim sudom za ljudska prava
Evropska Konvencija o ljudskim pravima
Praktični vodič za primenu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima
Priručnici i vodiči kroz praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Evropski sud za ljudska prava u 50 pitanja
Glosar Evropske Konvencije o ljudskim pravima
Nacionalna mreža sudija i tužilaca za primenu standarda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Preuzmite presudu u pdf formatu
EVROPSKI SUD ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA
PETO ODJELJENJE
PREDMET JOVAŠEVIĆ I DRUGI protiv CRNE GORE
(Predstavka br. 41809/14)
PRESUDA
STRAZBUR
10. februar 2022. godine
Ova presuda je pravosnažna ali može biti predmet redakcijske izmjene.
U predmetu Jovašević i drugi protiv Crne Gore, Evropski sud za ljudska prava (Peto odjeljenje), na zasijedanju Odbora u sastavu:
Lətif Hüseynov, predsjednik,
Lado Chanturia,
Arnfinn Bårdsen, sudije,
i Viktoriya Maradudina, v.d. zamjenika registrara Odjeljenja,
Nakon vijećanja na sjednici zatvorenoj za javnost, održanoj 20. januara 2022. godine,
Donosi sljedeću presudu, koja je usvojena tog dana:
POSTUPAK
ČINJENICE
PRAVO
I SMRT NEKIH PODNOSILACA PREDSTAVKE
II NAVODNA POVREDA ČLANA 6 STAV 1 KONVENCIJE
Član 6 stav 1
“Svako, tokom odlučivanja o njegovim građanskim pravima i obavezama … ima pravo na … raspravu u razumnom roku pred … sudom…”
III PRIMJENA ČLANA 41 KONVENCIJE
„Kada Sud utvrdi prekršaj Konvencije ili Protokola uz nju, a unutrašnje pravo Visoke strane ugovornice u pitanju omogućava samo djelimičnu odštetu, Sud će, ako je to potrebno, pružiti pravično zadovoljenje oštećenoj strani.“
IZ TIH RAZLOGA, SUD, JEDNOGLASNO
Odlučuje da izbriše predstavku sa liste predmeta u dijelu u kojem su je podnijela četiri podnosioca predstavke koji su u priloženoj tabeli označeni pod brojevima 1, 3, 5 i 7, a ostatak predstavke proglašava prihvatljivom;
Utvrđuje da je u predmetnoj predstavci došlo do povrede člana 6 stav 1 Konvencije u vezi sa prekomjernom dužinom trajanja upravnog postupka;
Utvrđuje
(a) da tužena država treba da plati podnosiocima predstavke, izuzimajući podnosioce predstavke koji su preminuli, u roku od tri mjeseca, iznose koji su navedeni u priloženoj tabeli, po stopi primjenjivoj na dan uplate;
(b) da će se od dana isteka gore pomenuta tri mjeseca do dana isplate obračunavati kamata koja je jednaka najnižoj kamatnoj stopi Evropske centralne banke uz dodatak od tri procentna poena;
Sačinjeno na engleskom jeziku i dostavljeno u pisanoj formi, 10. februara 2022. godine, u skladu sa Pravilom 77 stavovi 2 i 3 Poslovnika Suda.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov v.d.
zamjenika registrara predsjednik
PRILOG
Predstavkom su pokrenute pritužbe na osnovu člana 6 stav 1 Konvencije (prekomjerna dužina trajanja upravnog postupka)
|
Predstavka br. Datum podnošenja |
Ime podnosioca predstavke Godina rođenja |
Datum početka postupka |
Okončanje postupka |
Ukupna dužina trajanja Nivoi nadležnosti |
Iznos dodijeljen za nematerijalnu štetu po podnosiocu predstavke (u eurima)[1] |
Iznos dodijeljen za troškove i izdatke po predstavci (u eurima)[2] |
|
41809/14 14. maj 2014. godine (12 podnosilaca predstavke) |
1. Milica JOVAŠEVIĆ, godina rođenja: 1929. godine, datum smrti: 14. mart 2015. god. 2. Nikola JOVAŠEVIĆ, 1983. godine 3. Miroljub JOVAŠEVIĆ, godina rođenja: 1962. godine, datum smtrti: 17. decembar 2015. god 4. Stevan JOVAŠEVIĆ, 1934. godine 5. Ljubica MARKOVIĆ, godina rođenja: 1933. godine, datum smrti: 15. april 2021. godine 6. Branislava MATOVIĆ, 1941. godine 7. Branko DŽAKOVIĆ, Godina rođenja: 1939. godine, Datum smrti: 13. oktobar 2019. godine 8. Zoran ŠILJAK, 1957. godine 9. Vesna PALEOCHORITU MITROVIĆ, 1952. godine 10. Dragoljub MILOŠEVIĆ, 1949. godine 11. Nebojša CUCIĆ, 1962. godine 12. Mirjana TRIFUNOVIĆ, godine |
28. jun 2010. godine
|
u toku
|
Više od 11 godina, 3 mjeseca i 22 dana
1 nivo nadležnosti
|
2.500, isključujući podnosioce predstavke Milica JOVAŠEVIĆ, Miroljub JOVAŠEVIĆ, Ljubica MARKOVIĆ i Branko DŽAKOVIĆ
|
250 |
[1] Uvećano za poreze koji se mogu naplatiti podnosiocima predstavke.
[2] Uvećano za poreze koji se mogu naplatiti podnosiocima predstavke.
____________________________________________
Prevod presude preuzet sa https://sudovi.me/vrhs/sadrzaj/NQN9
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF JOVAŠEVIĆ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
(Application no. 41809/14)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
10 February 2022
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision
In the case of Jovašević and Others v. Montenegro, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lətif Hüseynov, President,
Lado Chanturia,
Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 20 January 2022,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in an application against Montenegro lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 14 May 2014.
2. The applicants were represented by Mr D. Milošević, a lawyer practising in Belgrade.
3. The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the application.
THE FACTS
4. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the application are set out in the appended table.
5. The applicants complained of the excessive length of administrative proceedings.
THE LAW
6. The applicants’ representative informed the Court that four applicants (see the appended table for further details) had died during the proceedings before it. The representative, however, failed to submit authority forms signed by their heirs.
7. In these circumstances, the Court concludes that none of the deceased applicants’ heirs have expressed a wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
8. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list in respect of the four applicants whose dates of death are mentioned in the appended table.
9. The applicants complained that the length of the administrative proceedings in question had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
Article 6 § 1
“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
10. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
11. In the leading case of Živaljević v. Montenegro, no. 17229/04, §§ 72-78, 8 March 2011, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
12. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.
13. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
14. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Živaljević, cited above, § 85), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction.
16. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, excluding the deceased ones, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 10 February 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
baza unakrsnih veza