Analiza slučaja pred Evropskim sudom za ljudska prava
Evropska Konvencija o ljudskim pravima
Praktični vodič za primenu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima
Priručnici i vodiči kroz praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Evropski sud za ljudska prava u 50 pitanja
Glosar Evropske Konvencije o ljudskim pravima
Nacionalna mreža sudija i tužilaca za primenu standarda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Preuzmite presudu u pdf formatu
EVROPSKI SUD ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA
ĈETVRTI ODJEL
PREDMET ŠKRBIĆ I VUJIĈIĆ protiv BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
(Aplikacije br. 37444/17 i 75271/17)
PRESUDA
STRASBOURG
6.06.2019. godine
Ova presuda je konačna ali su u njoj moguće uredničke izmjene.
U predmetu Škrbić i Vujiĉić protiv Bosne i Hercegovine, Evropski sud za ljudska prava (Ĉetvrti odjel), zasjedajući kao odbor u sastavu:
Georges Ravarani, predsjednik,
Marko Bošnjak,
Péter Paczolay, sudije,
i Liv Tigerstedt v.d. zamjenik registrara Odjela,
nakon vijećanja zatvorenog za javnost održanog 16.05.2019. godine, donio je sljedeću presudu koja je usvojena navedenog datuma:
POSTUPAK
ĈINJENICE
PRAVO
I SPAJANJE APLIKACIJA
II NAVODNA POVREDA ĈLANA 6. stav 1. KONVENCIJE
Ĉlan 6. stav 1.
„Prilikom odluĉivanja o njegovim gradjanskim pravima i obavezama ... svako ima pravo na ...sudjenje u razumnom roku....pred ...sudom...“
III PRIMJENA ĈLANA 41. KONVENCIJE
„Ukoliko Sud utvrdi da je došlo do povrede Konvencije ili njenih Protokola, te ukoliko zakonodavstvo visoke ugovorne strane o kojoj je rijeĉ omogućuje samo djelomiĉno obeštećenje, Sud će, po potrebi, odrediti praviĉnu naknadu oštećenoj strani.“
IZ NAVEDENIH RAZLOGA SUD JE JEDNOGLASNO,
Saĉinjeno na engleskom jeziku i dostavljeno u pisanom obliku dana 6.06.2019. godine, u skladu s pravilom 77. stavovi 2. i 3. Pravila Suda.
Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani
v.d. zamjenik registrara predsjednik
DODATAK
Lista aplikacija sa pritužbama prema ĉlanu 6. stav 1. Konvencije (prekomjerna dužina parniĉnog i/ili upravnog postupka)
|
Br. |
Aplikacija br. Datum podnošenja |
Ime i prezime aplikanta Datum rodjenja |
Poĉetak postupka ili Datum stupanja na snagu Konvencije u odnosu na Bosnu i Hercegovinu (12.07.2002) |
Završetak postupka |
Ukupna duţina Nivoi nadleţnosti |
Relevantna domaća odluka Iznos dosudjen domaćom odlukom (u eurima) |
Iznos dosudjen za nematerijalnu štetu po aplikantu (u eurima)1 |
Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros)2 |
|
1. |
37444/17 11/05/2017 |
Ţivko Škrbić 10/07/1957 |
20/02/2004 |
13/02/2014 |
9 godina i 11 mjeseci i 25 dana 3 nivoa nadležnosti |
AP-1771/14 (700) |
1.200 umanjeno za sve iznose koji su već isplaćeni po tom osnovu na domaćem nivou |
100 |
|
2. |
75271/17 13/10/2017 |
Zoran Vujiĉić 30/07/1967 |
12/07/2002 |
30/04/2014 |
11 godina i 9 mjeseci i 19 dana 3 nivoa nadležnosti |
AP-3300/14 (1.000) |
1.800 umanjeno za sve iznose koji su već isplaćeni po tom osnovu na domaćem nivou |
- |
1 Plus svaki porez koji se aplikantima može zaraĉunati.
2 Plus svaki porez koji se aplikantima može zaraĉunati.
___________________________________
Prevod presude preuzet sa https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF ŠKRBIĆ AND VUJIČIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
(Applications nos. 37444/17 and 75271/17)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
6 June 2019
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Škrbić and Vujičić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Georges Ravarani, President,
Marko Bošnjak,
Péter Paczolay, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 16 May 2019,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the dates indicated in the appended table.
2. Notice of the applications was given to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”).
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
6. The applicants complained that the length of the civil proceedings in question had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
Article 6 § 1
“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
7. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
8. In the leading cases of Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, 8 December 2009, and Dorić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [Committee], no. 68811/13, 7 November 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.
10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
III. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
11. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, 8 December 2009), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and to dismiss the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.
13. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the applications admissible;
3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings;
4. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
5. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2019, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Liv TigerstedtGeorges Ravarani
Acting Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil and/or administrative proceedings)
|
No. |
Application no. Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name Date of birth
|
Start of proceedings or Date of entry into force of the Convention in respect of Bosnia and Herzegovina (12 July 2002) |
End of proceedings |
Total length Levels of jurisdiction |
Relevant domestic decision Domestic award (in euros) |
Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros)[1] |
Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros)[2] |
|
11/05/2017 |
Živko Škrbić 10/07/1957 |
20/02/2004
|
13/02/2014
|
9 years and 11 months and 25 days 3 levels of jurisdiction
|
AP-1771/14 (700) |
1,200 less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level |
100 |
|
|
13/10/2017 |
Zoran Vujičić 30/07/1967 |
12/07/2002
|
30/04/2014
|
11 years and 9 months and 19 days 3 levels of jurisdiction
|
AP-3300/14 (1,000) |
1,800 less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level |
- |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
[2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
baza unakrsnih veza